« Home | Help! » | The Biggest Lie? » | Cicadas » | In the moment » | Inquiring Minds » | Perplexed » | The nerve! » | Conflict » | Assinine » | Change of Direction »

Top 10...

Top 10 Reasons why the 9-11 Hijackers were fabricated...

hi this is a great site you've put together here

hope you don't mind my borrowing this for my random clips blog

of course i gave your full linkback and everything

if you wanna drop by i'm at gledwood2.blogspot that's my main blog-journal all my other stuff is linked via my profile and my right sidebar "gledwood's other blogs" ...

you're most welcome to drop by any time you like

see you there hopefully

all the best


gledwood vol 2

Angela I am trying to get my head around all of this. I understand that there is something very wrong with how convenient the whole story was laid out for the public in such a short period of time.

I always assumed that passenger jets would NEVER be shot out of the sky by American Military planes under any circumstances.
I know that truth can be stranger than fiction..but was it all to bolster and maintain the obscene Military budget expenses.

I have noticed that they are trying to make Putin out to be a loose cannon again...very handy.
How 'sold' are you on all of this?
Is this going to get any traction during the campaign?

O'Reilly does have a good point (and you have no idea how awful it feels to agree with that arsehole)
but why isn't ANY media putting the whole thing out there PAGE ONE in some other country?

Now that you've turned me into a full blown conspiracy nut if you mysteriously vanish or stop blogging I am going to torch my files and slip into the night like Mel Gibson did to his apartment in that movie.

Press any key to prove that you're OK...

She's alive. It's her birthday, even! :)

(er.. well, yesterday)

Hi HE, thanks for writing and taking an interest. Sorry for being so quiet, just busy...

I am very sold on the alternative conspiracy theories (that is, those not developed by the government)regarding 9/11. Over the past few weeks, after much research, I have come to seriously despise and suspect the Bush administration for many devious and self-serving acts, domestic and international, that have caused suffering and pain to millions.

Obviously, only a select few know what really happened on 9/11 and why it happened. One of the prevalent theories that I have read is that many in the Bush administration (Rumsfeld, Cheney, Libby, etc.) were part of an organization that architected a plan to bring about American global domination (including space domination) prior to Bush coming into office (circa 1998 I think). Obviously, mass funding is needed for such a military feat and supposedly this group believed that the American public would only fund the efforts if faced with great risk. Therefore, the group hypothesized that funds could be secured only if a "new Pearl Harbor" occurred -- aka 9/11. A great overview book to read on the matter is The New Pearl Harbor by David Ray Griffin.

The media's avoidance of the topic of the government's involvement of 9/11 is a topic many 9/11 truthers speculate about. One major theory seems to revolve around the fact that most American media is controlled by a select number of large corporations. I believe that there has been some foreign press about the topic, however, I speculate that those who take the topic too far are subject to consequences, like many of the American whistle blowers.

I really don't know what the truth is regarding 9/11 (obviously) and maybe the government wasn't involved. However, the government's actions highly suggest complicity on their part. I think the 9/11 truth movement is becoming more prevalent and will hopefully lead to an independent, unbiased look into what happened on 9/11, as that has not yet occurred. I also wonder about whether the topic will become an issue of the election, but I fear not as the topic may still be a bit too taboo unless the media jumps on board.

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link